Написание аннотации к тексту

Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 20 Декабря 2011 в 13:07, доклад

Описание работы

An annotation is a concise description of a particular work, including important aspects of content not evident in the title. It enables the researcher to establish the relevance of a specific work and to decide whether to read the full text of the work.

Работа содержит 1 файл

аннотирование.doc

— 492.50 Кб (Скачать)

 I GENERAL IDEA 

    An annotation is a concise description of a particular work, including important aspects of content not evident in the title. It enables the researcher to establish the relevance of a specific work and to decide whether to read the full text of the work.

    Assignments often call for an annotated bibliography. When required to write an annotation for each source used, the annotation should:

  • explain why the source is relevant to your research; and
  • critically examine the source.

    An annotation is a brief summary of a book, article, or other publication. An abstract is also a summary, but there is a difference between the two. An abstract is simply a summary of a work, whereas the purpose of an annotation is to describe the work in such a way that the reader can decide whether or not to read the work itself. An annotated bibliography helps the reader understand the particular usefulness of each item. The ideal annotated bibliography shows the relationships among individual items and may compare their strengths or shortcomings.

    There are three distinct types of annotations:

    a DESCRIPTIVE annotation merely identifies the areas to be covered in the report. It is an extended statement of purpose or scope. Such an annotation is only useful for a very long report, because it demonstrates only the paper's organization, not its content.

    an INFORMATIVE annotation summarizes the entire report and gives the reader an overview of the facts that will be laid out in detail in the paper itself. It is rarely longer than one page and should never exceed more than 10% of the length of the entire report; otherwise it defeats its own purpose.

    a CRITICAL annotation in addition to describing the contents, evaluates the usefulness of a book or article for particular situations. An annotation has certain features that set it aside from other pieces of academic writing.

  • it is always short;
  • it is written for the same audience as the article/report, so it uses the same level of technical language;
  • it always summarizes the major points of the results;
  • it summarizes the major points of the materials and methods, and of the discussion;

    in most disciplines, it never includes bibliographic citations. 

Comprehension questions:

  1. For what purposes is annotation written?
  2. What is the difference between the abstract and annotation?
  3. What are the two types of annotations?

 TASK 1 In pairs decide which of the annotations are descriptive, critical or informative. Give reasons. 

1

Computerized speech recognition takes advantage of the most natural form of communication, the human voice. During speech, sound is generated by the vocal cords and by air rushing from the lungs. If the vocal cords vibrate, a voiced sound is produced; otherwise, the sound is unvoiced. The main problem in speech recognition is that no two voices produce their sounds alike and that an individual voice varies in different conditions. Because voices do vary and because words blend together in a continuous stream in natural speech, most recognition systems require that each speaker train the machine to his or her voice and that words have at least one-tenth of a second pause between them. Such a system is called an isolated word recognition system and consists of three major components that process human speech: (1) the preprocessor which removes irregularities from the speech signal and then breaks it up into parts; (2) the feature extractor which extracts 32 key features from the signal; and (3) the classification phase which identifies the spoken word and includes the training mode and reference pattern memory. Spoken words are identified on the basis of a certain decision algorithm, some of which involve dynamic programming, zero crossing rate, linear predictive coding, and the use of state diagram. 

2

Voice recognition systems offer many applications including data entry, freedom for mobility, security uses, telephone access, and helpful devices for the handicapped. However, these same systems also face problems such as poor recognition accuracy, loss of privacy among those who use them, and limited vocabulary sizes. The goal of the industry is the development of speaker-independent systems that can recognize continuous human speech regardless of the speaker and that can continually improve their vocabulary size and recognition accuracy. 

3

Herbert London, a Dean at New York University and author of several books and articles, explains how television contradicts five ideas commonly believed by most people, using specific examples seen on television, such as the assassination of John Kennedy, to demonstrate his points. His examples contradict such truisms as "seeing is believing", "a picture is worth a thousand words", and "satisfaction is its own reward." London uses logical arguments to support his ideas, and doesn't refer to any previous works on the topic: the article is his personal opinion. His style and vocabulary would make the article of interest to any reader. The article clearly illustrates London's points, but does not explore their implications, leaving the reader with many unanswered questions. 

4

The author explains how television contradicts five ideas commonly believed by most people, using specific examples seen on television, such as the assassination of John Kennedy, to demonstrate his points. His examples contradict such truisms as "seeing is believing", "a picture is worth a thousand words", and "satisfaction is its own reward." London uses logical arguments to support his ideas, and doesn't refer to any previous works on the topic: the article is his personal opinion.

 

 II ABSTRACT STRUCTURE

    The following points provide guidance for writing annotations. As appropriate each of these issues might be assessed and commented on in the annotation. 

    
Introduction (background information)

    Introduce the study by describing the context.

    Explain why the subject is important.

e.g. In order to reduce costs, Thompson Consulting needs to find an alternative material for a top-secret military jet engine.

    
Qualifications of author(s) (if available)

    Qualifications of the author, unless very well known, should be clearly stated. Preferably this is to be done early in the annotation.

    e.g. ‘Based on 20 years of study, William A. Smith, professor of English at Leeds University…’

    
   Outline of major thesis, theories and ideas (purpose, scope)

What is the author's reason for writing?

    Does the author state a purpose for doing the research and/or writing the piece? If not, can the purpose be inferred?

e.g. Tim Berners Lee played a key role in the development of World Wide Web.

Major bias or standpoint of the author

What the author’s opinion concerning the main idea?

e.g. The text focuses on a distinctive group of engineers and entrepreneurs who improved the designs of computer technology and found ways to make the computer more attractive to people.

    
Methods (ways of investigation)

    What method of obtaining data or conducting research was employed by the author?

e.g. Researchers conducted speed tests on the new quantum computer that was supposed to solve billions operations a second.

Results (if available)

What are the consequences of the problem or issue

that the author is discussing?

    Report the results that were found.

    e.g. Pre-training program scores of 385 on the LSAT and 750 on the combined GRE climbed to 435 and 895 respectively.

    
    
Relationship to other works in this field (if available)

    How does the research result compare with similar studies?

    Are all similar studies cited by the author?

    e.g. The approach, findings and conclusions were similar to those of Henley in Anodic Oxidation of Aluminum and Its Alloys (Elsevier Science Ltd, 1982)

    
     The intended audience and level of reading difficulty.

    Does the piece have an intended audience?

    This is not always present in an annotation but is important if the work is targeted to a specific audience.

    e.g. Schmidt addresses himself to the scholar, but the concluding chapters will be clear to any computer user.

    
    
Conclusion

    What conclusions does the author draw from his/her study of the issue or problem?

Are the conclusions in line with the original purpose of the research?

    e.g. This research will move our understanding forward of how brains work, and could have a profound effect on many areas of science and medicine.

    
    
Special features (if available)

    Bibliography, glossary, index, survey, instruments, testing devices, etc.

    e.g. A short list of readings is appended.

    
 
 

 TASK 2 Read the annotation in italics and study its elements.

"Access-Limited Logic -- A Language for Knowledge Representation." The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Computer Sciences. AI Technical Report 90-141. October 1990. 237 pages. 

Hermjakob, Ph.D. Qualifications of author
Access-Limited Logic (ALL) is a language for knowledge representation which formalizes the access limitations inherent in a network structured knowledge-base. Introduction
Where a deductive method such as resolution would retrieve all assertions that satisfy a given pattern, an access-limited logic retrieves all assertions reachable by following an available access path. Outline of major thesis, theories and ideas

(purpose and scope)

The time complexity of inference is thus a polynomial function of the size of the accessible portion of the knowledge- base, rather than the size of the entire knowledge-base. Access-Limited Logic, though incomplete, still has a well defined semantics and a weakened form of completeness, Socratic Completeness, which guarantees that for any query which is a logical consequence of the knowledge-base, there exists a series of queries after which the original query will succeed. Major bias, standpoint of the author
We have implemented ALL in Lisp and it has been used to build several non-trivial systems, including versions of Qualitative Process Theory and Pearl's probability networks. Methods (ways of investigation)
ALL is a step toward providing the properties - clean semantics, efficient inference, expressive power - which will be necessary to build large, effective knowledge bases. Conclusion

 

 TASK 3 Read carefully the annotation from the field of computer assisted learning. What structure elements from the table above do the sentences 1-7 refer to? 

Use of A Writing Web-Site By Pre-Masters Students On An English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Course

A.J. Gillett, University of Hertfordshire 

1 During the last 10 years, use of the World-Wide-Web for educational purposes has increased dramatically. 2 However, very little empirical research has been carried out to determine the effectiveness of this use. 3 The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the effectiveness of using the World-Wide-Web on an EAP writing course. 4 Two groups of students were taught writing by two different methods: one group was taught by a teacher in a traditional classroom, while a second group included use of an on-line web-site in their course. 5 The two groups were assessed in the same way after a twelve-week period of instruction. 6 Results of the assessment showed significant differences between the two groups, the group that used the on-line web-site performing much better on all aspects of the test. 7 This suggests that the use of computer assisted learning programmes for at least some of the teaching time available can be recommended for EAP writing courses. 

Sentence 1 ____________introduction______________

Sentence 2 ___________________________________

Sentence 3 ___________________________________

Sentence 4 ___________________________________

Sentence 5 ___________________________________

Sentence 6 ___________________________________

Sentence 7 ___________________________________

 

 III HOW TO WRITE A GOOD ANNOTATION?

To write an effective annotation you need to pay attention to its content and format. These tips will help you:

  • Look specifically for these main parts of the article, paper, or report: purpose, methods, scope, results, conclusions and recommendation.
  • Begin with introduction and the summary.
  • Use the headings, outline heads, and table of contents as a guide to write your annotation.
  • Search through the entire document for key terms that identify the purpose, scope, and methods of the work.
  • To create the first draft of an annotation read through the entire paper and cut and paste sentences that particularly capture key passages in order to paraphrase them later in the annotation.
  • Don't copy key sentences from the article, paper, or report: you'll put in too much or too little information.
  • Don't rely on the way material was phrased in the article, paper, or report: summarize information in your own way.
C

O

N

T

E

N

T

SENTENCES. Whole sentences are preferable, but single descriptive words and simple phrases or lists are acceptable. Complex sentences should be avoided.

PARAGRAPHS. Annotations should be one single paragraph. Avoid writing a paragraph that is nothing more than a series of unconnected sentences summarizing separate ideas, arguments and conclusions, by following the same order of information as the author and by using transitional words and phrases.

  • Typically annotations do not exceed 150 to 200 words.
F

O

R

M

A

T

  • Use the vocabulary of the author as much as possible to convey the ideas and conclusions of the author.
  • If you decide to include a quotation from the source, place it within quotation marks.
W

O

R

D

S

 

DOs

  • Make you annotation unified, coherent, concise, and able to stand alone.
  • Follow strictly the chronology of the article, paper, or report.
  • Provide logical connections between the information included.
  • Make it understandable to a wide audience.
  • Use passive verbs to downplay the author and emphasize the information.

DON’Ts

  • Do not start with "this paper…”, "this report…" or similar. It is better to write about the research than about the paper.
  • Do not explain the sections or parts of the paper.
  • Avoid sentences that end in "…is described", "…is reported", "…is analyzed" or similar.
  • Do not begin sentences with "it is suggested that…” "it is believed that…", "it is felt that…"or similar. In every case, the four words can be omitted without damaging the essential message.
  • Do not repeat or rephrase the title.
  • Do not refer in the abstract to information that is not in the document.
  • If possible, avoid trade names, acronyms, abbreviations, or symbols. You would need to explain them, and that takes too much room. [3]

TASK 4 Read the annotations and in pairs decide which of them is good, bad or middling. Give reasons. You can find the source article in APPENDIX 1 (1).

1

I absolutely agree with the author of this article. I think the problem, which is lightened here is really important. Our government spends huge amounts of money on nonsense, but they should concentrate on the supporting of environment and developing the new methods of making our planet and our city better. First of all I suggest investing some money in education. I think we must educate new generation about the environmental problems because only they can find reasonable solution and develop new environment protecting technologies. New generation is innovative and smart. Our future is in our hands and we are responsible for leaving Tomsk, and the whole planet, clean and beautiful for next generations. In addition to that new technologies and new industries will enjoy lots of people, which is a solution of the problem of unemployment in Tomsk, particularly today, in the situation of economic crisis. On my point of view we should develop: clean energy and clean technologies including recycling, agriculture, ecosystem infrastructure. It is all about making our life better. It is all about avoiding financial, fuel and food crises in future. Let’s be humane and intelligent.

2

The article analyses problems of development of economy in circumstances of financial, fuel and food crises. Modern economy needs to be re-focused and re-oriented. The reason of failure of economy is disability of government to manage and direct industry development. Thus, the author suggests paying attention to nature infrastructure such as forests and soils and creating sustainable business. According to him, it will help to change global situation, create new jobs and overcome crisis. He underlines that subsidies amount in those areas are not enough especially in comparison to global GDP and worsening of ecological situation. Ha also marks five priority areas to develop. In conclusion, author appeals to be more mobile and flexible to solve economical problems.

3

The given article is focused on the problem of sustainable business. To consider this issue United Nations (UNEP) Executive Director Achim Steiner pointed out that the best way to accelerate growth of global economy was to invest in clean businesses. The author examines that there are a lot of various stimulus, which don’t support environment. Furthermore, the paper shows that the spending of the environment is not enough at all, it’s valued just10 per cent of investments needed. But Mr. Steiner underlined that there were some advantages from investing in natural infrastructure – one of them is creation new work places. This article presents some figures of income in different industries and number of employees accordingly. In conclusion the paper gives information about five main areas, which support economic growth in this century.

Информация о работе Написание аннотации к тексту