Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 30 Ноября 2011 в 18:25, реферат
The States Parties to the present Convention
Considering the fundamental role of treaties in the history of international
relations,
Recognizing the ever-increasing importance of treaties as a source of
international law and as a means of developing peaceful co-operation among
nations, whatever their constitutional and social systems,
(a) it is established that the parties intended to admit the possibility of
denunciation or withdrawal; or
(b) a right of denunciation or withdrawal may be implied by the nature of the
treaty.
2. A party shall give not less than twelve months' notice of its intention to
denounce or withdraw from a treaty
under paragraph 1.
ARTICLE 57 - SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A TREATY UNDER ITS PROVISIONS OR BY
CONSENT OF THE PARTIES
------------------------------
The operation of a treaty in regard to all the parties or to a particular party
may be suspended:
(a) in conformity with the provisions
of the treaty; or
(b) at any time by consent of all the parties after consultation with the other
contracting States.
ARTICLE 58 - SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A MULTILATERAL TREATY BY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CERTAIN OF THE PARTIES ONLY
------------------------------
1. Two or more parties to a multilateral treaty may conclude an agreement to
suspend the operation of provisions of the treaty, temporarily and as between
themselves alone, if:
(a) the possibility of such a suspension
is provided for by the treaty; or
(b) the suspension in question is not
prohibited by the treaty and:
(i) does not affect the enjoyment by the other parties of their rights under
the treaty or the performance of their
obligations;
(ii) is not incompatible with the object
and purpose of the treaty.
2. Unless in a case falling under paragraph 1(a) the treaty otherwise provides,
the parties in question shall notify the other parties of their intention to
conclude the agreement and of those provisions of the treaty the operation of
which they intend to suspend.
ARTICLE 59 - TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A TREATY IMPLIED BY
CONCLUSION OF A LATER TREATY
------------------------------
1. A treaty shall be considered as terminated if all the parties to it conclude
a later treaty relating to the same
subject-matter and:
(a) it appears from the later treaty or is otherwise established that the
parties intended that the matter should
be governed by that treaty; or
(b) the provisions of the later treaty are so far incompatible with those of
the earlier one that the two treaties are not capable of being applied at the
same time.
2. The earlier treaty shall be considered as only suspended in operation if it
appears from the later treaty or is otherwise established that such was the
intention of the parties.
ARTICLE 60 - TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A TREATY AS A
CONSEQUENCE OF ITS BREACH
------------------------------
1. A material breach of a bilateral treaty by one of the parties entitles the
other to invoke the breach as a ground for terminating the treaty or suspending
its operation in whole or in part.
2. A material breach of a multilateral
treaty by one of the parties entitles:
(a) the other parties by unanimous agreement to suspend the operation of the
treaty in whole or in part or to terminate
it either:
(i) in the relations between themselves
and the defaulting State, or
(ii) as between all the parties;
(b) a party specially affected by the breach to invoke it as a ground for
suspending the operation of the treaty in whole or in part in the relations
between itself and the defaulting State;
(c) any party other than the defaulting State to invoke the breach as a ground
for suspending the operation of the treaty in whole or in part with respect to
itself if the treaty is of such a character that a material breach of its
provisions by one party radically changes the position of every party with
respect to the further performance
of its obligations under the treaty.
3. A material breach of a treaty, for the purposes of this article, consists
in:
(a) a repudiation of the treaty not
sanctioned by the present Convention; or
(b) the violation of a provision essential to the accomplishment of the object
or purpose of the treaty.
4. The foregoing paragraphs are without prejudice to any provision in the
treaty applicable in the event of a
breach.
5. Paragraphs 1 to 3 do not apply to provisions relating to the protection of
the human person contained in treaties of a humanitarian character, in
particular to provisions prohibiting any form of reprisals against persons
protected by such treaties.
ARTICLE 61 - SUPERVENING IMPOSSIBILITY OF PERFORMANCE
------------------------------
1. A party may invoke the impossibility of performing a treaty as a ground for
terminating or withdrawing from it if the impossibility results from the
permanent disappearance or destruction of an object indispensable for the
execution of the treaty. If the impossibility is temporary, it may be invoked
only as a ground for suspending the
operation of the treaty.
2. Impossibility of performance may not be invoked by a party as a ground for
terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty if the
impossibility is the result of a breach by that party either of an obligation
under the treaty or of any other international obligation owed to any other
party to the treaty.
ARTICLE 62 - FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES
------------------------------
1. A fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to
those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not
foreseen by the parties, may not be invoked as a ground for terminating or
withdrawing from the treaty unless:
(a) the existence of those circumstances constituted an essential basis of the
consent of the parties to be bound
by the treaty; and
(b) the effect of the change is radically to transform the extent of
obligations still to be performed under
the treaty.
2. A fundamental change of circumstances may not be invoked as a ground for
terminating or withdrawing from a treaty:
(a) if the treaty establishes a boundary;
or
(b) if the fundamental change is the result of a breach by the party invoking
it either of an obligation under the treaty or of any other international
obligation owed to any other party
to the treaty.
3. If, under the foregoing paragraphs, a party may invoke a fundamental change
of circumstances as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from a treaty it
may also invoke the change as a ground for suspending the operation of the
treaty.
ARTICLE 63 - SEVERANCE OF DIPLOMATIC OR CONSULAR RELATIONS
------------------------------
The severance of diplomatic or consular relations between parties to a treaty
does not affect the legal relations established between them by the treaty
except in so far as the existence of diplomatic or consular relations is
indispensable for the application of
the treaty.
ARTICLE 64 - EMERGENCE OF A NEW PEREMPTORY NORM OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW
(JUS COGENS)
------------------------------
If a new peremptory norm of general international law emerges, any existing
treaty which is in conflict with that
norm becomes void and terminates.
SECTION 4. - PROCEDURE
======================
ARTICLE 65 - PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED WITH RESPECT TO INVALIDITY, TERMINATION,
WITHDRAWAL FROM OR SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A TREATY
------------------------------
1. A party which, under the provisions of the present Convention, invokes
either a defect in its consent to be bound by a treaty or a ground for
impeaching the validity of a treaty, terminating it, withdrawing from it or
suspending its operation, must notify the other parties of its claim. The
notification shall indicate the measure proposed to be taken with respect to
the treaty and the reasons therefor.
2. If, after the expiry of a period which, except in cases of special urgency,
shall not be less than three months after the receipt of the notification, no
party has raised any objection, the party making the notification may carry out
in the manner provided in article 67
the measure which it has proposed.
3. If, however, objection has been raised by any other party, the parties shall
seek a solution through the means indicated in article 33 of the Charter of the
United Nations.
4. Nothing in the foregoing paragraphs shall affect the rights or obligations
of the parties under any provisions in force binding the parties with regard to
the settlement of disputes.
5. Without prejudice to article 45, the fact that a State has not previously
made the notification prescribed in paragraph 1 shall not prevent it from
making such notification in answer to another party claiming performance of the
treaty or alleging its violation.
ARTICLE 66 - PROCEDURES FOR JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT, ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION
------------------------------
If, under paragraph 3 of article 65, no solution has been reached within a
period of 12 months following the date on which the objection was raised, the
following procedures shall be followed:
(a) any one of the parties to a dispute concerning the application or the
interpretation of articles 53 or 64 may, by a written application, submit it to
the International Court of Justice for a decision unless the parties by common
consent agree to submit the dispute
to arbitration;
(b) any one of the parties to a dispute concerning the application or the
interpretation of any of the other articles in Part V of the present Convention
may set in motion the procedure specified in the Annexe to the Convention by
submitting a request to that effect to the Secretary-General of the United
Nations.
ARTICLE 67 - INSTRUMENTS FOR DECLARING INVALID, TERMINATING, WITHDRAWING FROM
OR SUSPENDING THE OPERATION OF A TREATY
------------------------------
1. The notification provided for under article 65 paragraph 1 must be made in
writing.
2. Any act declaring invalid, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the
operation of a treaty pursuant to the provisions of the treaty or of paragraphs
2 or 3 of article 65 shall be carried out through an instrument communicated to
the other parties. If the instrument is not signed by the Head of State, Head
of Government or Minister for Foreign Affairs, the representative of the State
communicating it may be called upon
to produce full powers.
ARTICLE 68 - REVOCATION OF NOTIFICATIONS AND INSTRUMENTS PROVIDED FOR IN
ARTICLES 65 AND 67
------------------------------
A notification or instrument provided for in articles 65 or 67 may be revoked
at any time before it takes effect.
SECTION 5. - CONSEQUENCES OF THE INVALIDITY, TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE
OPERATION OF A TREATY
==============================
ARTICLE 69 - CONSEQUENCES OF THE INVALIDITY OF A TREATY
------------------------------
1. A treaty the invalidity of which is established under the present Convention
is void. The provisions of a void treaty
have no legal force.
2. If acts have nevertheless been performed
in reliance on such a treaty:
(a) each party may require any other party to establish as far as possible in
their mutual relations the position that would have existed if the acts had not
been performed;
(b) acts performed in good faith before the invalidity was invoked are not
rendered unlawful by reason only of
the invalidity of the treaty.
3. In cases falling under articles 49, 50, 51 or 52, paragraph 2 does not apply
with respect to the party to which the fraud, the act of corruption or the
coercion is imputable.
4. In the case of the invalidity of a particular State's consent to be bound by
a multilateral treaty, the foregoing rules apply in the relations between that
State and the parties to the treaty.
ARTICLE 70 - CONSEQUENCES OF THE TERMINATION OF A TREATY
------------------------------
1. Unless the treaty otherwise provides or the parties otherwise agree, the
termination of a treaty under its provisions or in accordance with the present
Convention:
(a) releases the parties from any obligation
further to perform the treaty;
(b) does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties
created through the execution of the
treaty prior to its termination.
2. If a State denounces or withdraws from a multilateral treaty, paragraph 1
applies in the relations between that State and each of the other parties to
the treaty from the date when such
denunciation or withdrawal takes effect.
ARTICLE 71 - CONSEQUENCES OF THE INVALIDITY OF A TREATY WHICH CONFLICTS WITH A
PEREMPTORY NORM OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW
------------------------------
1. In the case of a treaty which is
void under article 53 the parties shall:
(a) eliminate as far as possible the consequences of any act performed in
reliance on any provision which conflicts with the peremptory norm of general
international law; and
(b) bring their mutual relations into conformity with the peremptory norm of
general international law.
2. In the case of a treaty which becomes void and terminates under article 64,
the termination of the treaty:
(a) releases the parties from any obligation
further to perform the treaty;
(b) does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties