Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 30 Ноября 2011 в 18:25, реферат
The States Parties to the present Convention
Considering the fundamental role of treaties in the history of international
relations,
Recognizing the ever-increasing importance of treaties as a source of
international law and as a means of developing peaceful co-operation among
nations, whatever their constitutional and social systems,
ARTICLE 35 - TREATIES PROVIDING FOR OBLIGATIONS FOR THIRD STATES
------------------------------
An obligation arises for a third State from a provision of a treaty if the
parties to the treaty intend the provision to be the means of establishing the
obligation and the third State expressly
accepts that obligation in writing.
ARTICLE 36 - TREATIES PROVIDING FOR RIGHTS FOR THIRD STATES
------------------------------
1. A right arises for a third State from a provision of a treaty if the parties
to the treaty intend the provision to accord that right either to the third
State, or to a group of States to which it belongs, or to all States, and the
third State assents thereto. Its assent shall be presumed so long as the
contrary is not indicated, unless the
treaty otherwise provides.
2. A State exercising a right in accordance with paragraph 1 shall comply with
the conditions for its exercise provided for in the treaty or established in
conformity with the treaty.
ARTICLE 37 - REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION OF OBLIGATIONS OR RIGHTS OF THIRD
STATES
------------------------------
1. When an obligation has arisen for a third State in conformity with article
35, the obligation may be revoked or modified only with the consent of the
parties to the treaty and of the third State, unless it is established that
they had otherwise agreed.
2. When a right has arisen for a third State in conformity with article 36, the
right may not be revoked or modified by the parties if it is established that
the right was intended not to be revocable or subject to modification without
the consent of the third State.
ARTICLE 38 - RULES IN A TREATY BECOMING BINDING ON THIRD STATES THROUGH
INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM
------------------------------
Nothing in articles 34 to 37 precludes a rule set forth in a treaty from
becoming binding upon a third State as a customary rule of international law,
recognized as such.
PART IV - AMENDMENT AND MODIFICATION OF TREATIES
******************************
ARTICLE 39 - GENERAL RULE REGARDING THE AMENDMENT OF TREATIES
------------------------------
A treaty may be amended by agreement between the parties. The rules laid down
in Part II apply to such an agreement except in so far as the treaty may
otherwise provide.
ARTICLE 40 - AMENDMENT OF MULTILATERAL TREATIES
------------------------------
1. Unless the treaty otherwise provides, the amendment of multilateral treaties
shall be governed by the following
paragraphs.
2. Any proposal to amend a multilateral treaty as between all the parties must
be notified to all the contracting States, each one of which shall have the
right to take part in:
(a) the decision as to the action to
be taken in regard to such proposal;
(b) the negotiation and conclusion of any agreement for the amendment of the
treaty.
3. Every State entitled to become a party to the treaty shall also be entitled
to become a party to the treaty as
amended.
4. The amending agreement does not bind any State already a party to the treaty
which does not become a party to the amending agreement; article 30, paragraph
4(b), applies in relation to such State.
5. Any State which becomes a party to the treaty after the entry into force of
the amending agreement shall, failing an expression of a different intention by
that State:
(a) be considered as a party to the
treaty as amended; and
(b) be considered as a party to the unamended treaty in relation to any party
to the treaty not bound by the amending
agreement.
ARTICLE 41 - AGREEMENTS TO MODIFY MULTILATERAL TREATIES BETWEEN CERTAIN OF THE
PARTIES ONLY
------------------------------
1. Two or more of the parties to a multilateral treaty may conclude an
agreement to modify the treaty as between
themselves alone if:
(a) the possibility of such a modification
is provided for by the treaty; or
(b) the modification in question is
not prohibited by the treaty and:
(i) does not affect the enjoyment by the other parties of their rights under
the treaty or the performance of their
obligations;
(ii) does not relate to a provision, derogation from which is incompatible with
the effective execution of the object
and purpose of the treaty as a whole.
2. Unless in a case falling under paragraph 1(a) the treaty otherwise provides,
the parties in question shall notify the other parties of their intention to
conclude the agreement and of the modification to the treaty for which it
provides.
PART V - INVALIDITY, TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF TREATIES
******************************
SECTION 1. - GENERAL PROVISIONS
==============================
ARTICLE 42 - VALIDITY AND CONTINUANCE IN FORCE OF TREATIES
------------------------------
1. The validity of a treaty or of the consent of a State to be bound by a
treaty may be impeached only through
the application of the present Convention.
2. The termination of a treaty, its denunciation or the withdrawal of a party,
may take place only as a result of the application of the provisions of the
treaty or of the present Convention. The same rule applies to suspension of the
operation of a treaty.
ARTICLE 43 - OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY INTERNATIONAL LAW INDEPENDENTLY OF A TREATY
------------------------------
The invalidity, termination or denunciation of a treaty, the withdrawal of a
party from it, or the suspension of its operation, as a result of the
application of the present Convention or of the provisions of the treaty, shall
not in any way impair the duty of any State to fulfil any obligation embodied
in the treaty to which it would be subject under international law
independently of the treaty.
ARTICLE 44 - SEPARABILITY OF TREATY PROVISIONS
------------------------------
1. A right of a party, provided for in a treaty or arising under article 56, to
denounce, withdraw from or suspend the operation of the treaty may be exercised
only with respect to the whole treaty unless the treaty otherwise provides or
the parties otherwise agree.
2. A ground for invalidating, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the
operation of a treaty recognized in the present Convention may be invoked only
with respect to the whole treaty except as provided in the following paragraphs
or in article 60.
3. If the ground relates solely to particular clauses, it may be invoked only
with respect to those clauses where:
(a) the said clauses are separable from the remainder of the treaty with regard
to their application;
(b) it appears from the treaty or is otherwise established that acceptance of
those clauses was not an essential basis of the consent of the other party or
parties to be bound by the treaty as
a whole; and
(c) continued performance of the remainder
of the treaty would not be unjust.
4. In cases falling under articles 49 and 50 the State entitled to invoke the
fraud or corruption may do so with respect either to the whole treaty or,
subject to paragraph 3, to the particular
clauses alone.
5. In cases falling under articles 51, 52 and 53, no separation of the
provisions of the treaty is permitted.
ARTICLE 45 - LOSS OF A RIGHT TO INVOKE A GROUND FOR INVALIDATING, TERMINATING,
WITHDRAWING FROM OR SUSPENDING THE OPERATION OF A TREATY
------------------------------
A State may no longer invoke a ground for invalidating, terminating,
withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty under articles 46 to
50 or articles 60 and 62 if, after
becoming aware of the facts:
(a) it shall have expressly agreed that the treaty is valid or remains in force
or continues in operation, as the case
may be; or
(b) it must by reason of its conduct be considered as having acquiesced in the
validity of the treaty or in its maintenance in force or in operation, as the
case may be.
SECTION 2. - INVALIDITY OF TREATIES
==============================
ARTICLE 46 - PROVISIONS OF INTERNAL LAW REGARDING COMPETENCE TO CONCLUDE
TREATIES
------------------------------
1. A State may not invoke the fact that its consent to be bound by a treaty has
been expressed in violation of a provision of its internal law regarding
competence to conclude treaties as invalidating its consent unless that
violation was manifest and concerned a rule of its internal law of fundamental
importance.
2. A violation is manifest if it would be objectively evident to any State
conducting itself in the matter in accordance with normal practice and in good
faith.
ARTICLE 47 - SPECIFIC RESTRICTIONS ON AUTHORITY TO EXPRESS THE CONSENT OF A
STATE
------------------------------
If the authority of a representative to express the consent of a State to be
bound by a particular treaty has been made subject to a specific restriction,
his omission to observe that restriction may not be invoked as invalidating the
consent expressed by him unless the restriction was notified to the other
negotiating States prior to his expressing
such consent.
ARTICLE 48 - ERROR
------------------
1. A State may invoke an error in a treaty as invalidating its consent to be
bound by the treaty if the error relates to a fact or situation which was
assumed by that State to exist at the time when the treaty was concluded and
formed an essential basis of its consent
to be bound by the treaty.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the State in question contributed by its own
conduct to the error or if the circumstances were such as to put that State on
notice of a possible error.
3. An error relating only to the wording of the text of a treaty does not
affect its validity; article 79 then
applies.
ARTICLE 49 - FRAUD
------------------
If a State has been induced to conclude a treaty by the fraudulent conduct of
another negotiating State, the State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its
consent to be bound by the treaty.
ARTICLE 50 - CORRUPTION OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF A STATE
------------------------------
If the expression of a State's consent to be bound by a treaty has been
procured through the corruption of its representative directly or indirectly by
another negotiating State, the State may invoke such corruption as invalidating
its consent to be bound by the treaty.
ARTICLE 51 - COERCION OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF A STATE
------------------------------
The expression of a State's consent to be bound by a treaty which has been
procured by the coercion of its representative through acts or threats directed
against him shall be without any legal
effect.
ARTICLE 52 - COERCION OF A STATE BY THE THREAT OR USE OF FORCE
------------------------------
A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of
force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the
Charter of the United Nations.
ARTICLE 53 - TREATIES CONFLICTING WITH A PEREMPTORY NORM OF GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW (JUS COGENS)
------------------------------
A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a
peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present
Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted
and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm
from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a
subsequent norm of general international
law having the same character.
SECTION 3. - TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF TREATIES
==============================
ARTICLE 54 - TERMINATION OF OR WITHDRAWAL FROM A TREATY UNDER ITS PROVISIONS OR
BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES
------------------------------
The termination of a treaty or the
withdrawal of a party may take place:
(a) in conformity with the provisions
of the treaty; or
(b) at any time by consent of all the parties after consultation with the other
contracting States.
ARTICLE 55 - REDUCTION OF THE PARTIES TO A MULTILATERAL TREATY BELOW THE NUMBER
NECESSARY FOR ITS ENTRY INTO FORCE
------------------------------
Unless the treaty otherwise provides, a multilateral treaty does not terminate
by reason only of the fact that the number of the parties falls below the
number necessary for its entry into
force.
ARTICLE 56 - DENUNCIATION OF OR WITHDRAWAL FROM A TREATY CONTAINING NO
PROVISION REGARDING TERMINATION, DENUNCIATION OR WITHDRAWAL
------------------------------
1. A treaty which contains no provision regarding its termination and which
does not provide for denunciation or withdrawal is not subject to denunciation
or withdrawal unless: