Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 07 Февраля 2013 в 18:33, курсовая работа
Created in 1965 through the merger of Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay, PepsiCo is one of the strongest beverage and convenient food companies in the world. Originally started in 1898, Pepsi Cola became the first branded soft drink in the world. Its brand is available in over 200 countries around the world and generated sales in excess of $92 billion last year. Headquartered in Purchase, New York, PepsiCo is the number two beverage company in the world behind the Coca-Cola Company.
Suleyman Demirel University
Faculty of economics
Course Project on Strategic Management
Strategic Management Process of
PepsiCo
Prepared by: Arman Umishev, management 4
Subject: Strategic Management
Submitted to: Saule Bolegenova
Kaskelen, 2012
Executive Summary
Created in 1965 through the merger of Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay, PepsiCo is one of the strongest beverage and convenient food companies in the world. Originally started in 1898, Pepsi Cola became the first branded soft drink in the world. Its brand is available in over 200 countries around the world and generated sales in excess of $92 billion last year. Headquartered in Purchase, New York, PepsiCo is the number two beverage company in the world behind the Coca-Cola Company.
Financially, 2006 was a year of progress with an overall growth of 5.5%, revenue of nearly 36 billion USD and a return on investment of 26%. These numbers are all well above the industry average, with their main competitor still being the Coca-Cola Company. PepsiCo has continued their brand image by appealing to Generation Y and becoming synonymous with music, entertainment and sports. In addition to their financial success, PepsiCo is also dedicated to ethics and social responsibility in the community. They have invested heavily in recycling programs and in developing nations in Africa. PepsiCo even has a sustainability mission that states “PepsiCo’s responsibility is to continually improve all aspects of the world in which we operate- environmental, social, economic- creating a better tomorrow than today.”
They believe that they have the competitive, sustainable advantage in the industry because of three things: big brands, proven innovation and differentiated products, and powerful go-to markets. With their strong brand, socially responsible employees and corporate beliefs and focus on the younger generation, PepsiCo will continue its stance as one of the most powerful companies in the world.
VISION
“PepsiCo’s responsibility is to continually improve all aspects of the world in which we operate - environment, social, economic - creating a better tomorrow than today.”
Pepsi cola international vision is put into action through programs and a focus on environmental stewardship, activities to benefit society, and a commitment to build shareholder value by making PepsiCo a truly sustainable company.
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission is to be the world’s premier consumer Products Company focused on convenient foods and beverages. We seek to produce financial rewards to investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness and integrity.
Developing mission statement
We have absolute clarity about what we do ‘WE SELL HIGH QUALITY FOOD AND BEVERAGE PRODUCTS.’ Our success will ensure: customers will build their business, employees build their futures, and shareholders build their wealth."
Objectives
Strategic acquisitions
Product Reformations
Achieve Synergies
Close Relationships with distribution allies
International expansion
Maintain efficient distribution system
The company has three main goals in terms of water conservation:”
External opportunities and threats
OPPORTUNITY:
PepsiCo New Products Can Easily Penetrate In The Market.
Noncarbonated Drinks Are the Fastest-Growing Industry
Demand of Pepsi Is More than Of Competitor
Changing Social Trends (Fast Foods)
Internet Promotion and Ordering Processes
May Tie Up or Liaison with Major Showrooms, Computer Centers & Restaurant
THREATS:
Non-Carbonated Substitutes (The Mango Season)
Beverage Industry Is Mature
Fake Products (Imitators)
Competitor’s Schemes
Strong Competition with Coca-Cola Company
External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
EXTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFE) MATRIX |
|||
Opportunity |
WEIGHT |
RATE |
T.SCORE |
PepsiCo New Products Can Easily Penetrate In The Market. |
0.09 |
4 |
0.36 |
Noncarbonated Drinks .Are The Fastest-Growing Industry |
0.11 |
3.00 |
0.33 |
Demand Of Pepsi Is More Than Of Competitor |
0.07 |
3.00 |
0.21 |
Changing Social Trends (Fast Foods) |
0.09 |
3.00 |
0.27 |
Internet Promotion And Ordering Processes |
0.06 |
1.00 |
0.06 |
May Tie Up Or Liaison With Major Showrooms. Computer Centers &Restaurant |
0.07 |
2.00 |
0.14 |
Threats |
|||
Non-Carbonated Substitutes (The Mango Season) |
0.14 |
3.00 |
0.42 |
Beverage Industry Is Mature |
0.12 |
4.00 |
0.48 |
Fake Products (Imitators) |
0.10 |
2.00 |
0.20 |
Competitor's Schemes |
0.05 |
2.00 |
0.10 |
Strong Competition With Coca-Cola Company |
0.10 |
2.00 |
0.20 |
Total |
1.00 |
2.77 |
Internal STRENGHTS and WEAKNESS
STRENGHTS:
Strong Multinational (Brand Equity)
Strong & Vast Distribution Channels
Lack of Capital Constraints
Record Market Share
Strong Brand Portfolio
Aggressiveness In The Market (Market Leader)
Brand Promotion & Sponsorship
WEAKNESS:
Targeting Only Young Customers
Political Franchises
Centralized Decision Making
Decline In Taste
Motivational Factor
Not All Products Bear the Company Name
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
INTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIS (IFE) MATRIX |
|||
Strengths |
WEIGHT |
RATE |
T.SCORE |
Strong Multinational (Brand Equity) |
0.11 |
3.00 |
0.33 |
Strong & Vast Distribution Channels |
0.09 |
4.00 |
0.36 |
Lack Of Capital Constraints |
0.07 |
3.00 |
0.21 |
Record Market Share |
0.10 |
4.00 |
0.40 |
Strong Brand Portfolio |
0.06 |
3.00 |
0.1 |
Aggressiveness In The Market (Market Leader) |
0.07 |
3.00 |
0.21 |
Brand Promotion & Sponsorship |
0.12 |
4.00 |
0.48 |
Weakness |
|||
Targeting Only Young Customers |
0.09 |
2.00 |
0.18 |
Political Franchises |
0.06 |
2.00 |
0.12 |
Centralized Decision Making |
0.05 |
2.00 |
0.10 |
Decline In Taste |
0.09 |
1.00 |
0.09 |
Motivational Factor |
0.05 |
1.00 |
0.05 |
Not All Products Bear The company Name |
0.04 |
2.00 |
o.o8 |
Total |
1.00 |
2.79 |
COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX
PEPSICO. |
COCA COLA CO. |
Kraft food | |||||
Critical Success Factors |
WEIGHT |
RATE |
T.SCORE |
RATE |
T.SCORE |
||
Plant Location |
0.07 |
3.00 |
0.21 |
3.00 |
0.21 |
3 |
0.21 |
Strong Brand Image |
0.1 |
4.00 |
0.44 |
4.00 |
0.44 |
3 |
0.33 |
Global Expansion |
0.09 |
3.00 |
0.27 |
3.00 |
0.27 |
2 |
0.18 |
Market Share |
0.12 |
4.00 |
0.48 |
3.00 |
0.36 |
2 |
0.24 |
Product Quality |
0.12 |
3.00 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
0.36 |
4 |
0.27 |
Production Capacity |
0.08 |
2.00 |
0.32 |
3.00 |
0.24 |
2 |
0.16 |
Innovation |
0.11 |
3.00 |
0.33 |
3.00 |
0.33 |
3 |
0.33 |
Control Over Supply Chain |
0.06 |
3.00 |
0.18 |
4.00 |
0.24 |
3 |
0.18 |
Availability |
0.1 |
4.00 |
0.44 |
4.00 |
0.44 |
2 |
0.22 |
Advertising |
0.1 |
3.00 |
0.33 |
4.00 |
0.44 |
3 |
0.33 |
Bottling Investment & Empty Mgt |
0.05 |
3.00 |
0.15 |
3.00 |
0.15 |
3 |
0.15 |
Total |
1 |
3.34 |
3.48 |
2.58 | |||
The Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) identifies PepsiCo major competitors (Coca-Cola) and its particular strengths and weaknesses in relation to firm’s current strategic position.
The two most important factors to being successful in the industry are “market share” and “product quality,” as indicated by weights of 0.12. PepsiCo’s current strategy’s response to these factors is good, as indicated by its 2 rating.
Note in Competitive Profile Matrix Coca-Cola is strongest on “product quality” and “Strong Brand Image” as indicated by a rating of 4, whereas Kraft food is strongest on “Product Quality”, PepsiCo is strongest in “market share” and “Strong Brand Image”.
Overall, Coca-Cola is strongest, as indicated by the total weighted score of 3.48. PepsiCo total weighted score is 3.34. It is above than average. Its current strategy’s response to “Product Quality” and “Market Share” . Company has to focus on this area of its business in order to overcome its competitors.
SWOT Matrix
Strengths |
Weaknesses | |
|
|
|
Opportunities |
S-O Strategies |
W-O Strategies |
|
Company Can Introduce New Product Or Non-Carbonated Drinks Because It Have Good Brand Equity, Large Resources
By Having Good Distribution Channel and lack of capital can acquire small companies in new market and Can Focus Easily Fast Food Restaurants, Clubs. |
By Introducing Non-Carbonated Drinks Pepsi Can Capture Different Age Groups.
|
Threats |
S-T Strategies |
W-T Strategies |
|
Because Co. Has Financial Recourses And Distribution Channel Therefore It Can Produce Non-Carbonated Drinks.
|
By improving the taste & quality company can reposition its products can take long term position on maturity stage.
|
Critical region: SO Strategies (Strength-Opportunities)
An Important Tool to Develop Four Types of Strategies:
The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix
Financial position |
rating |
Stability position |
rating |
Return on investment NI Liquidity Cash flow ROE ROA Earnings per share Inventory turnover
Average |
4 3 4 5 4 4 4 5
4.125 |
Economic stability Demand Changes Price elasticity of demand Competitive pressure Barriers to entry new market Price range from competing products
Average |
-2 -1 -1 -3 -2 -1
-1.67 |
Competitive position |
Industry position |
||
Market share Product quality Consumer loyalty Control over suppliers Brand recognition
Average |
-2 -3 -4 -2 -3
-2.8 |
Growth potential Financial stability Ease of entry new market Resources utilization Profit potential Demand variability Average |
5 4 6 3 3 3 4 |
SP average -1.67 IP average 4
CP average -2.8 FP average 4.125
X-axis: CP+IP=-2.8+4=1.2
Y-axis: SP+FP=-1.67+4.125=2.455
A firm whose financial strength a dominating factor in the industry, so PepsiCo is very aggressive company in the market.
Aggressive profile
The Internal- External (IE) Matrix
The IFE Total Weighted Score | ||||
4 |
Strong 3 |
Average 2 |
Weak 1 | |
High
3 |
I
|
II |
hold | |
The EFE Total Weighted Score |
Medium
2 |
IV Invest |
V hold
|
VI Harvest |
Low
1 |
VII hold |
VIII Harvest |
IX Divest | |
The IE Matrix is based on two key dimensions: the IFE total weighted scores on the x-axis and the EFE total weighted scores on the y-axis EFE 2.77 IFE 2.79 V suggests the hold and maintains strategy. In this case, tactical strategies focus on market penetration and product development |
The BCG growth –Share Matrix
Division |
Revenue |
% Revenue |
Profit |
Profit % |
Market Share |
Market Growth |
Frito-Lay North America |
$ 13322 |
20% |
$ 3,621 |
33.5% |
1 |
5.62% |
Quaker Foods North America |
$ 2.656 |
4% |
$ 797 |
7.5% |
1 |
0% |
Latin America Foods |
$ 7.156 |
11% |
$ 1.078 |
10% |
1 |
11.75% |
PepsiCo Americas Beverages |
$ 22.418 |
34% |
$ 3273 |
30% |
0.8 |
9% |
Europe |
$ 13.560 |
20% |
$ 1.210 |
11% |
0.4 |
20% |
Asia, Middle East & Africa |
$ 7.392 |
11% |
$ 887 |
8% |
0.3 |
14.9% |
Total |
$ 66..504 |
100% |
$ 10866 |
100% |
Relative market share | |||
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 | |||
Industry Sales Growth Rate |
10% +20
35.5%
+10
7.5%
0
+10
-20 |
30%
Stars |
11% 8%
Question marks |
Cash cows |
Dogs |
From table we can see that PepsiCo is composed of 6 geographic divisions with annual total 66.504 million. Circles represent sales volume of each division. The pie slices within the circles reveal the percent of corporate profits contributed by each division.
Asia, Middle East & Africa and Europe divisions is Question Mark. Because have a low relative market share position, yet they compete in a high-growth industry. PepsiCo has strengthened them by pursuing an intensive strategy (market penetration, market development, or product development).