Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 06 Февраля 2011 в 17:07, реферат
It is not a part of the plan of this book to present any extended bibliography, but there are certain reference books to which the student's attention should be called.
These latter
qualities appear also in the lyrics which abound in the plays of John
Fletcher, and yet it cannot be said that Fletcher's sweet melody is
more classical than Elizabethan. His other distinctive quality is the
tone of somewhat artificial courtliness which was soon to mark the lyrics
of the other poets of the Cavalier party. An avowed disciple of Jonson
and his classicism and a greater poet than Fletcher is Robert Herrick,
who, indeed, after Shakspere and Milton, is the finest lyric poet of
these two centuries.
Herrick, the
nephew of a wealthy goldsmith, seems, after a late graduation from Cambridge,
to have spent some years about the Court and in the band of Jonson's
'sons.' Entering the Church when he was nearly forty, he received the
small country parish of Dean Prior in the southwest (Devonshire), which
he held for nearly twenty years, until 1647, when he was dispossessed
by the victorious Puritans. After the Restoration he was reinstated,
and he continued to hold the place until his death in old age in 1674.
He published his poems (all lyrics) in 1648 in a collection which he
called
'Hesperides
and Noble Numbers.' The 'Hesperides' (named from the golden apples of
the classical Garden of the Daughters of the Sun) are twelve hundred
little secular pieces, the 'Noble Numbers' a much less extensive series
of religious lyrics. Both sorts are written in a great variety of stanza
forms, all equally skilful and musical. Few of the poems extend beyond
fifteen or twenty lines in length, and many are mere epigrams of four
lines or even two. The chief secular subjects are: Herrick's devotion
to various ladies, Julia, Anthea, Perilla, and sundry more, all presumably
more or less imaginary; the joy and uncertainty of life; the charming
beauty of Nature; country life, folk lore, and festivals; and similar
light or familiar themes. Herrick's characteristic quality, so far as
it can be described, is a blend of Elizabethan joyousness with classical
perfection of finish. The finish, however, really the result of painstaking
labor, such as Herrick had observed in his uncle's shop and as Jonson
had enjoined, is perfectly unobtrusive; so apparently natural are the
poems that they seem the irrepressible unmeditated outpourings of happy
and idle moments. In care-free lyric charm Herrick can certainly never
be surpassed; he is certainly one of the most captivating of all the
poets of the world. Some of the 'Noble Numbers' are almost as pleasing
as the 'Hesperides,' but not because of real religious significance.
For of anything that can be called spiritual religion Herrick was absolutely
incapable; his nature was far too deficient in depth. He himself and
his philosophy of life were purely Epicurean, Hedonistic, or pagan,
in the sense in which we use those terms to-day. His forever controlling
sentiment is that to which he gives perfect expression in his best-known
song, 'Gather ye rosebuds,' namely the Horatian 'Carpe diem'--'Snatch
all possible pleasure from the rapidly-fleeting hours and from this
gloriously delightful world.' He is said to have performed his religious
duties with regularity; though sometimes in an outburst of disgust at
the stupidity of his rustic parishioners he would throw his sermon in
their faces and rush out of the church. Put his religion is altogether
conventional. He thanks God for material blessings, prays for their
continuance, and as the conclusion of everything, in compensation for
a formally orthodox life, or rather creed, expects when he dies to be
admitted to Heaven. The simple naivete with which he expresses this
skin-deep and primitive faith is, indeed, one of the chief sources of
charm in the 'Noble Numbers.'
Herrick belongs
in part to a group of poets who, being attached to the Court, and devoting
some, at least, of their verses to conventional love-making, are called
the Cavalier Poets. Among the others Thomas Carew follows the classical
principles of Jonson in lyrics which are facile, smooth, and sometimes
a little frigid. Sir John Suckling, a handsome and capricious representative
of all the extravagances of the Court set, with whom he was enormously
popular, tossed off with affected carelessness a mass of slovenly lyrics
of which a few audaciously impudent ones are worthy to survive. From
the equally chaotic product of Colonel Richard Lovelace stand out the
two well-known bits of noble idealism, 'To Lucasta, Going to the Wars,'
and 'To Althea, from Prison.' George Wither (1588-1667), a much older
man than Suckling and Lovelace, may be mentioned with them as the writer
in his youth of light-hearted love-poems. But in the Civil War he took
the side of Parliament and under Cromwell he rose to the rank of major-general.
In his later life he wrote a great quantity of Puritan religious verse,
largely prosy in spite of his fluency.
The last important
group among these lyrists is that of the more distinctly religious poets.
The chief of these, George Herbert (1593-1633), the subject of one of
the most delightful of the short biographies of Izaak Walton, belonged
to a distinguished family of the Welsh Border, one branch of which held
the earldom of Pembroke, so that the poet was related to the young noble
who may have been Shakspere's patron. He was also younger brother of
Lord Edward Herbert of Cherbury, an inveterate duellist and the father
of English Deism. [Footnote: See below, p. 212.] Destined by his mother
to peaceful pursuits, he wavered from the outset between two forces,
religious devotion and a passion for worldly comfort and distinction.
For a long period the latter had the upper hand, and his life has been
described by his best editor, Professor George Herbert Palmer, as twenty-seven
years of vacillation and three of consecrated service. Appointed Public
Orator, or showman, of his university, Cambridge, he spent some years
in enjoying the somewhat trifling elegancies of life and in truckling
to the great. Then, on the death of his patrons, he passed through a
period of intense crisis from which he emerged wholly spiritualized.
The three remaining years of his life he spent in the little country
parish of Bemerton, just outside of Salisbury, as a fervent High Church
minister, or as he preferred to name himself, priest, in the strictest
devotion to his professional duties and to the practices of an ascetic
piety which to the usual American mind must seem about equally admirable
and conventional. His religious poems, published after his death in
a volume called 'The Temple,' show mainly two things, first his intense
and beautiful consecration to his personal God and Saviour, which, in
its earnest sincerity, renders him distinctly the most representative
poet of the Church of England, and second the influence of Donne, who
was a close friend of his mother. The titles of most of the poems, often
consisting of a single word, are commonly fantastic and symbolical--for
example, 'The Collar,' meaning the yoke of submission to God; and his
use of conceits, though not so pervasive as with Donne, is equally contorted.
To a present-day reader the apparent affectations may seem at first
to throw doubt on Herbert's genuineness; but in reality he was aiming
to dedicate to religious purposes what appeared to him the highest style
of poetry. Without question he is, in a true if special sense, a really
great poet.
The second
of these religious poets, Richard Crashaw, [Footnote: The first vowel
is pronounced as in the noun crash.] whose life (1612-1649) was not
quite so short as Herbert's, combined an ascetic devotion with a glowingly
sensuous esthetic nature that seems rather Spanish than English. Born
into an extreme Protestant family, but outraged by the wanton iconoclasm
of the triumphant Puritans, and deprived by them of his fellowship,
at Cambridge, he became a Catholic and died a canon in the church of
the miracle-working Lady (Virgin Mary) of Loretto in Italy. His most
characteristic poetry is marked by extravagant conceits and by ecstatic
outbursts of emotion that have been called more ardent than anything
else in English; though he sometimes writes also in a vein of calm and
limpid beauty. He was a poetic disciple of Herbert, as he avowed by
humbly entitling his volume 'Steps to the Temple.'
The life of
Henry Vaughan [Footnote: The second a is not now sounded.] (1621-1695)
stands in contrast to those of Herbert and Crashaw both by its length
and by its quietness. Vaughan himself emphasized his Welsh race by designating
himself 'The Silurist' (native of South Wales). After an incomplete
university course at Jesus College (the Welsh college), Oxford, and
some apparently idle years in London among Jonson's disciples, perhaps
also after serving the king in the war, he settled down in his native
mountains to the self-denying life of a country physician. His important
poems were mostly published at this time, in 1650 and 1655, in the collection
which he named 'Silex Scintillans' (The Flaming Flint), a title explained
by the frontispiece, which represents a flinty heart glowing under the
lightning stroke of God's call. Vaughan's chief traits are a very fine
and calm philosophic-religious spirit and a carefully observant love
of external Nature, in which he sees mystic revelations of God. In both
respects he is closely akin to the later and greater Wordsworth, and
his 'Retreat' has the same theme as Wordsworth's famous
'Ode on Intimations
of Immortality,' the idea namely that children have a greater spiritual
sensitiveness than older persons, because they have come to earth directly
from a former life in Heaven.
The contrast
between the chief Anglican and Catholic religious poets of this period
has been thus expressed by a discerning critic: 'Herrick's religious
emotions are only as ripples on a shallow lake when compared to the
crested waves of Crashaw, the storm-tides of Herbert, and the deep-sea
stirrings of Vaughan.'
We may give
a further word of mention to the voluminous Francis Quarles, who in
his own day and long after enjoyed enormous popularity, especially among
members of the Church of England and especially for his 'Emblems,' a
book of a sort common in Europe for a century before his time, in which
fantastic woodcuts, like Vaughan's 'Silex Scintillans,' were illustrated
with short poems of religious emotion, chiefly dominated by fear. But
Quarles survives only as an interesting curiosity.
Three other
poets whose lives belong to the middle of the century may be said to
complete this entire lyric group. Andrew Marvell, a very moderate Puritan,
joined with Milton in his office of Latin Secretary under Cromwell,
wrote much poetry of various sorts, some of it in the Elizabethan octosyllabic
couplet. He voices a genuine love of Nature, like Wither often in the
pastoral form; but his best-known poem is the 'Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's
Return from Ireland,' containing the famous eulogy of King Charles'
bearing at his execution. Abraham Cowley, a youthful prodigy and always
conspicuous for intellectual power, was secretary to Queen Henrietta
Maria after her flight to France and later was a royalist spy in England.
His most conspicuous poems are his so-called 'Pindaric Odes,' in which
he supposed that he was imitating the structure of the Greek Pindar
but really originated the pseudo-Pindaric Ode, a poem in irregular,
non-correspondent stanzas. He is the last important representative of
the 'Metaphysical' style. In his own day he was acclaimed as the greatest
poet of all time, but as is usual in such cases his reputation very
rapidly waned. Edmund Waller (1606-1687), a very wealthy gentleman in
public life who played a flatly discreditable part in the Civil War,
is most important for his share in shaping the riming pentameter couplet
into the smooth pseudo-classical form rendered famous by Dryden and
Pope; but his only notable single poems are two Cavalier love-lyrics
in stanzas, 'On a Girdle' and 'Go, Lovely Rose.'
JOHN MILTON, 1608-1674. Conspicuous above all his contemporaries as the representative poet of Puritanism, and, by almost equally general consent, distinctly the greatest of English poets except Shakspere, stands John Milton. His life falls naturally into three periods: 1. Youth and preparation, 1608-1639, when he wrote his shorter poems. 2. Public life,
Chapter VII.
Period V. The Seventeenth Century, 1603-1660. Prose And Poetry (Page
2)
1639-1660,
when he wrote, or at least published, in poetry, only a few sonnets.
3. Later years, 1660-1674, of outer defeat, but of chief poetic achievement,
the period of 'Paradise Lost,' 'Paradise Regained,' and
'Samson Agonistes.'
Milton was
born in London in December, 1608. His father was a prosperous scrivener,
or lawyer of the humbler sort, and a Puritan, but broad-minded, and
his children were brought up in the love of music, beauty, and learning.
At the age of twelve the future poet was sent to St. Paul's School,
and he tells us that from this time on his devotion to study seldom
allowed him to leave his books earlier than midnight. At sixteen, in
1625, he entered Cambridge, where he remained during the seven years
required for the M. A. degree, and where he was known as 'the lady of
Christ's'
[College],
perhaps for his beauty, of which all his life he continued proud, perhaps
for his moral scrupulousness. Milton was never, however, a conventional
prig, and a quarrel with a self-important tutor led at one time to his
informal suspension from the University. His nature, indeed, had many
elements quite inconsistent with the usual vague popular conception
of him. He was always not only inflexible in his devotion to principle,
but--partly, no doubt, from consciousness of his intellectual superiority--haughty
as well as reserved, self-confident, and little respectful of opinions
and feelings that clashed with his own. Nevertheless in his youth he
had plenty of animal spirits and always for his friends warm human sympathies.
To his college
years belong two important poems. His Christmas hymn, the
'Ode on the
Morning of Christ's Nativity,' shows the influence of his early poetical
master, Spenser, and of contemporary pastoral poets, though it also
contains some conceits--truly poetic conceits, however, not exercises
in intellectual cleverness like many of those of Donne and his followers.
With whatever qualifications, it is certainly one of the great English
lyrics, and its union of Renaissance sensuousness with grandeur of conception
and sureness of expression foretell clearly enough at twenty the poet
of 'Paradise Lost.' The sonnet on his twenty-third birthday, further,
is known to almost every reader of poetry as the best short expression
in literature of the dedication of one's life and powers to God.
Milton had
planned to enter the ministry, but the growing predominance of the High-Church
party made this impossible for him, and on leaving the University in
1632 he retired to the country estate which his parents now occupied
at Horton, twenty miles west of London. Here, for nearly six years,
amid surroundings which nourished his poet's love for Nature, he devoted
his time chiefly to further mastery of the whole range of approved literature,
Greek, Latin, French, Italian, and English. His poems of these years
also are few, but they too are of the very highest quality.
'L'Allegro'
and 'Il Penseroso' are idealized visions, in the tripping Elizabethan
octosyllabic couplet, of the pleasures of suburban life viewed in moods
respectively of light-hearted happiness and of reflection.
'Comus,' the
last of the Elizabethan and Jacobean masks, combines an exquisite poetic
beauty and a real dramatic action more substantial than that of any
other mask with a serious moral theme (the security of Virtue) in a
fashion that renders it unique. 'Lycidas' is one of the supreme English
elegies; though the grief which helps to create its power sprang more
from the recent death of the poet's mother than from that of the nominal
subject, his college acquaintance, Edward King, and though in the hands
of a lesser artist the solemn denunciation of the false leaders of the
English Church might not have been wrought into so fine a harmony with
the pastoral form.
Milton's first
period ends with an experience designed to complete his preparation
for his career, a fifteen months' tour in France and Italy, where the
highest literary circles received him cordially. From this trip he returned
in 1639, sooner than he had planned, because, he said, the public troubles
at home, foreshadowing the approaching war, seemed to him a call to
service; though in fact some time intervened before his entrance on
public life.
The twenty
years which follow, the second period of Milton's career, developed
and modified his nature and ideas in an unusual degree and fashion.
Outwardly the occupations which they brought him appear chiefly as an
unfortunate waste of his great poetic powers. The sixteen sonnets which
belong here show how nobly this form could be adapted to the varied
expression of the most serious thought, but otherwise Milton abandoned
poetry, at least the publication of it, for prose, and for prose which
was mostly ephemeral. Taking up his residence in London, for some time
he carried on a small private school in his own house, where he much
overworked his boys in the mistaken effort to raise their intellectual
ambitions to the level of his own. Naturally unwilling to confine himself
to a private sphere, he soon engaged in a prose controversy supporting
the Puritan view against the Episcopal form of church government, that
is against the office of bishops. There shortly followed the most regrettable
incident in his whole career, which pathetically illustrates also the
lack of a sense of humor which was perhaps his greatest defect. At the
age of thirty-four, and apparently at first sight, he suddenly married
Mary Powell, the seventeen-year-old daughter of a royalist country gentleman
with whom his family had long maintained some business and social relations.
Evidently this daughter of the Cavaliers met a rude disillusionment
in Milton's Puritan household and in his Old Testament theory of woman's
inferiority and of a wife's duty of strict subjection to her husband;
a few weeks after the marriage she fled to her family and refused to
return. Thereupon, with characteristic egoism, Milton put forth a series
of pamphlets on divorce, arguing, contrary to English law, and with
great scandal to the public, that mere incompatibility of temper was
adequate ground for separation. He even proceeded so far as to make
proposals of marriage to another woman. But after two years and the
ruin of the royalist cause his wife made unconditional submission, which
Milton accepted, and he also received and supported her whole family
in his house. Meanwhile his divorce pamphlets had led to the best of
his prose writings. He had published the pamphlets without the license
of Parliament, then required for all books, and a suit was begun against
him. He replied with
'Areopagitica,'
an, eloquent and noble argument against the licensing system and in
favor of freedom of publication within the widest possible limits. (The
name is an allusion to the condemnation of the works of Protagoras by
the Athenian Areopagus.) In the stress of public affairs the attack
on him was dropped, but the book remains, a deathless plea for individual
liberty.
Now at last
Milton was drawn into active public life. The execution of the King
by the extreme Puritan minority excited an outburst of indignation not
only in England but throughout Europe. Milton, rising to the occasion,
defended the act in a pamphlet, thereby beginning a paper controversy,
chiefly with the Dutch scholar Salmasius, which lasted for several years.
By 1652 it had resulted in the loss of Milton's eyesight, previously
over-strained by his studies--a sacrifice in which he gloried but which
lovers of poetry must always regret, especially since the controversy
largely consisted, according to the custom of the time, in a disgusting
exchange of personal scurrilities. Milton's championship of the existing
government, however, together with his scholarship, had at once secured
for him the position of Latin secretary, or conductor of the diplomatic
correspondence of the State with foreign countries. He held this office,
after the loss of his eyesight, with Marvell as a colleague, under both
Parliament and Cromwell, but it is an error to suppose that he exerted
any influence in the management of affairs or that he was on familiar
terms with the Protector. At the Restoration he necessarily lost both
the position and a considerable part of his property, and for a while
he went into hiding; but through the efforts of Marvell and others he
was finally included in the general amnesty.
In the remaining
fourteen years which make the third period of his life Milton stands
out for subsequent ages as a noble figure. His very obstinacy and egoism
now enabled him, blind, comparatively poor, and the representative of
a lost cause, to maintain his proud and patient dignity in the midst
of the triumph of all that was most hateful to him, and, as he believed,
to God. His isolation, indeed, was in many respects extreme, though
now as always he found the few sympathetic friends on whom his nature
was quite dependent. His religious beliefs had become what would at
present be called Unitarian, and he did not associate with any of the
existing denominations; in private theory he had even come to believe
in polygamy. At home he is said to have suffered from the coldness or
more active antipathy of his three daughters, which is no great cause
for wonder if we must credit the report that he compelled them to read
aloud to him in foreign languages of which he had taught them the pronunciation
but not the meaning. Their mother had died some years before, and he
had soon lost the second wife who is the subject of one of his finest
sonnets. In 1663, at the age of fifty-four, he was united in a third
marriage to Elizabeth Minshull, a woman of twenty-four, who was to survive
him for more than fifty years.
The important
fact of this last period, however, is that Milton now had the leisure
to write, or to complete, 'Paradise Lost.' For a quarter of a century
he had avowedly cherished the ambition to produce 'such a work as the
world would not willingly let die' and had had in mind, among others,
the story of Man's Fall. Outlines for a treatment of it not in epic
but in dramatic form are preserved in a list of a hundred possible subjects
for a great work which he drew up as early as 1640, and during the Commonwealth
period he seems not only to have been slowly maturing the plan but to
have composed parts of the existing poem; nevertheless the actual work
of composition belongs chiefly to the years following 1660. The story
as told in Genesis had received much elaboration in Christian tradition
from a very early period and Milton drew largely from this general tradition
and no doubt to some extent from various previous treatments of the
Bible narrative in several languages which he might naturally have read
and kept in mind. But beyond the simple outline the poem, like every
great work, is essentially the product of his own genius. He aimed,
specifically, to produce a Christian epic which should rank with the
great epics of antiquity and with those of the Italian Renaissance.
In this purpose
he was entirely successful. As a whole, by the consent of all competent
judges, 'Paradise Lost' is worthy of its theme, perhaps the greatest
that the mind of man can conceive, namely 'to justify the ways of God.'
Of course there are defects. The seventeenth century theology, like
every successive theological, philosophical, and scientific system,
has lost its hold on later generations, and it becomes dull indeed in
the long expository passages of the poem. The attempt to express spiritual
ideas through the medium of the secular epic, with its battles and councils
and all the forms of physical life, is of course rationally paradoxical.
It was early pointed out that in spite of himself Milton has in some
sense made Satan the hero of the poem--a reader can scarcely fail to
sympathize with the fallen archangel in his unconquerable Puritan-like
resistance to the arbitrary decrees of Milton's despotic Deity. Further,
Milton's personal, English, and Puritan prejudices sometimes intrude
in various ways. But all these things are on the surface. In sustained
imaginative grandeur of conception, expression, and imagery 'Paradise
Lost' yields to no human work, and the majestic and varied movement
of the blank verse, here first employed in a really great non-dramatic
English poem, is as magnificent as anything else in literature. It cannot
be said that the later books always sustain the greatness of the first
two; but the profusely scattered passages of sensuous description, at
least, such as those of the Garden of Eden and of the beauty of Eve,
are in their own way equally fine. Stately and more familiar passages
alike show that however much his experience had done to harden Milton's
Puritanism, his youthful Renaissance love of beauty for beauty's sake
had lost none of its strength, though of course it could no longer be
expressed with youthful lightness of fancy and melody. The poem is a
magnificent example of classical art, in the best Greek spirit, united
with glowing romantic feeling. Lastly, the value of Milton's scholarship
should by no means be overlooked. All his poetry, from the