Detection of microbial contaminants of meat

Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 26 Января 2012 в 08:46, дипломная работа

Описание работы

Food poisoning is an ever present health issue that is believed to exceed £1.5 billion a year to the UK economy. Microbial contamination of meat is the potential source of infection commonly associated with Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Escherichia

Работа содержит 1 файл

Detection of microbial contaminants of meat.doc

— 1.52 Мб (Скачать)

Immunological techniques include:

  • Western blotting
  • Immunoprecipitation
  • Immunofluorescence, Immunocytochemistry, Immunohistochemistry
  • Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbant Assay

Detection of bacteria is based on the ability of antibodies to recognise specific macromolecules, such as proteins or polysaccharides. Monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies are used for observation of a quantitative reaction of an antigen. The use of well selected antibodies is important for sensitivity and specificity of immuno-assays.

    1. DNA-based testing: PCR

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has rapidly become one of the most widely used techniques in the process of identification of micro organisms. This is the fastest way to screen bacterial colonies. Most nucleic-acid-based methods cannot distinguish between live and dead cells. However, some infectious diseases caused by a small amount of pathogen and it may be more complicated to establish causative agent by other methods. In case of Salmonella food poisoning cases, the presence of live bacterial cells is significant because only the presence of live cells may be considered significant.

PCR is used to amplify the target DNA about 100-1000 base pairs long. A DNA or RNA target sequence should be unique in order to detect, characterize and identify micro organisms. Artificially synthesized pair of single stranded oligonucleotide primers complementary to the flanking regions of the target sequence (Figure 8) along with a DNA polymerase is used for selective and repeated amplification of target DNA. The primers are complementary to either end of the target sequence but lie on opposite strands. The primers are usually 20-30 nucleotides long and bind to complementary flanking region at 3' end (Rao, 2011)

___________________________________________________________________

Flaking region--------II--------------------Target sequence----------------------II--------Flanking region  5’-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  A C C C G T T T G G G A T A T T G G G C C T T A T G G T T T A A T -  II  III III III III  II  II  II III III  III II  II  II  II  II  III III III  III III II  II  II  II III  III II  II II  II  II  II  - T G G G C A A A C C C T A T A A C C C G G A A T A C C A A A T T A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5’

___________________________________________________________________

Figure 8: Target DNA for amplification by PCR (Rao, 2011) 

Polymerase Chain Reaction is performed in the thermal cycler, which can regulate temperature during amplification and be programmed for the duration of process.

The process involves the repetition of three steps (Vierstraete, 1999) (Figure 9):

  • Heat denaturation, which separates the two nucleotide strands of the DNA molecule at 90-95oC
  • primer annealing, in which the primers bind to the single-stranded DNA at a lower temperature (50-65oC)
  • Figure 9: The different steps in PCR.

    Image downloaded from

     http://purpleopurple.com/inventions-and-inventors/polymerase-chain-reaction.html

    Primer extension, in which nucleotides are added to the primers at a temperature of 60-75oC – in the 5' to 3' direction – to form a double-stranded copy of the target DNA. 

    Figure 10: Verification of the PCR product on gel. (Vierstraet, 1999)

    Image downloaded from http://users.ugent.be/~avierstr/principles/pcr.html

     

    The amplification product can be detected using gel electrophoresis (Figure 10). The presence of a band containing DNA fragments of a particular size indicates the presence of the target sequence. The absence of a band indicates the absence of the target sequence. In this case, other techniques can be used in combination with PCR to detect specific target sequences. 

    DESIGN STUDY

    INTRODUCTION

    Microbial induced food poisoning continues to be a significant and on-going health problem in both developed and developing countries. For example, in the UK there are > 80,000 reported cases per year, costing the UK economy over £1.5 billion per annum (Ref?). The most common food-poisoning causing bacteria include Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., E. coli O157 and Staphylococcus aureus with consumption of infected meat products is the usual mode of transmission (Ref?).

    Accurate and definitive bacterial identification and pathogen detection is essential for correct disease diagnosis, determination of appropriate treatment and to establish the origin of disease outbreaks associated with microbial infections. Correct identification is also required to allow the screening of food products prior to their consumption. Methods for the detection and identification of micro-organisms can be culture-based methods using selective growth media, immunological techniques to detect specific microbial antigens and DNA-based testing, using PCR,  are all used for the purpose of identification of pathogenic micro-organisms.

    The aim of this project is to develop a PCR – based method for the detection of common food-poisoning causing bacteria in meat products.  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    FLOW CHART

     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    Design of oligonucleotde primers

    Species-specific oligonucleotide primers will be directed against the non-conserved regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene from the targeted organism(s) (Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157 and Staphylococcus aureus). Gene sequences from a number of micro-organisms will be download from the DNA sequence database, Genbank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank), and aligned using Clustal (a multiple sequence alignment programme) to identify the non-conserved regions.

    Once the targeted regions have identified, oligonucleotide primers will be designed to bind to these regions taking into account the following “rules” for designing primers:

    1. The primer length. The optimum length of a PCR primer is between 18-30 bases
    2. G+C content
    3. Tm of the primers
    4. GC clamp at the 3’ of the primers
     

    The specificity of the designed primers will be confirmed using BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

    Optimisation of PCR conditions for amplification of targeted gene sequences

    Optimal primer sequences and appropriate primer concentrations are essential for maximal specificity and efficiency in PCR as is optimisation of amplification conditions. For example, the number of cycles performed in the PCR reaction is important for amplification of sufficient amount of the targeted gene for further analysis such as agarose gel electrophoresis / DNA sequencing. This will require a series of trial experiments to optimise amplification conditions.

    Factors that will be examined include MgCl2 concentration, annealing temperature (Tm), number of PCR cycles, etc.  
     

    Detection of microbial DNA in meat samples

    Once PCR conditions have been optimised using purified genomic DNA (see above), meat samples from commercial sources will tested for the presence of microbial DNA. This will first involve optimising conditions for the extraction of DNA from meat samples that have been artificially “spiked” with purified genomic DNA. Once this has been optimised a variety of meat samples will be tested for the presence of the micro-organisms of interest. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    REFERENCES

    Baron S., (editor) (1996) Chapter 7, Bacterial Pathogenesis to Chapter 12. Staphylococcus in “Medical Microbiology”. (4th edition) Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996.

    Bentham G.; Langford I.H. (1994) “GEC-1994-15 : Climate Change and the Incidence of Food Poisoning in England and Wales” University of East Anglia, available on-line at http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1994_15.htm [Accessed 26 June 2011] 

    Brenner F. W., Villar R. G., Angulo F. J., Tauxe R., and Swaminathan B. (2000) “Salmonella Nomenclature” Journal of Clinical Microbiology., Jul 2000; 38: 2465 - 2467.

    Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (2011) “Food poisoning statistic – Englang and Wales” available on-line at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/post/publications-by-year/pubs1997 [Accessed 23 June 2011]

    Food and Environment Research Agency (2010)A UK wide survey of microbiological contamination of fresh red meats on retail sale. FSA Project B18018. Technical Report.” FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY; 2010. available on-line at http://www.foodbase.org.uk/results.php?f_report_id=548 [Accessed 23 June 2011]

    Frank C., Werber D., Cramer J. P,  Askar M., Faber M., an der Heiden M., Bernard H., Fruth A., Prager R., Spode A., Wadl, M., Zoufaly A., Jordan S., Stark K., Krause G. (2011) “Epidemic Profile of Shiga-Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany — Preliminary Report” The New England Journal of Medicine., published on June 22, 2011, and updated on June 24, 2011, at NEJM.org. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1106483#t=article [Accessed 23 June 2011]

    FSA (2010) “How to avoid food poisoning this summer” The Food Standards Agency The Health Protection Agency, 7 June 2010, available on-line at  http://www.hpa.org.uk/ProductsServices/LocalServices/SouthEast/SouthEastPressReleases/Kent/seast100607Howtoavoidfoodpoisoningthissummer  [Accessed 26 June 2011]

    Gundogdu O, Bentley SD, Holden MT, Parkhill J, Dorrell N, Wren BW. (2007) “Re-annotation and re-analysis of the Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 genome sequence.” BMC Genomics. 2007 Jun 12;8:162.

    Health Protection Agency (2010) “Food Poisoning Notifications - Annual Totals, England and Wales, 1982 – 2009” Health protection Agency; NOIDs reports and tables; available on-line at http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/InfectionsAZ/NotificationsOfInfectiousDiseases/NOIDSReportsAndTables [Accessed 23 June 2011]

    Iwen P.C. (2005) “Identification of Microbial Pathogens Using Nucleic Acid Sequencing” Nebraska Public Health Laboratory Newsletter available on-line at www.nphl.org/documents/Spring2005.pdf

    Lawrence, J. G.; Ochman, H. (1998). "Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95 (16): 9413–9417.

    Lloyds of London (2010) “The economic cost of infection.” The Economy News, available on-line at http://www.economy-news.co.uk/economic-costs-infection-23201004.html [Accessed 26 June 2011] 

    Moore JE, Corcoran D., Dooley J. S.G., Fanning S., Lucey B, Matsuda M., McDowell D.A., Mégraud F., Millar B.C., O’Mahony R., O’Riordan L., O’Rourke ., Rao J.R., Rooney P. J., Sails A., Whyte P. (2005). "Campylobacter". Veterinary Research 36 (3): 351–82.

    POST publications (1997)“P.O.S.T. Note 101 July 1997” Parliamentary Copyright, 1997. 7, Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. available on-line at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/post/publications-by-year/pubs1997  accessed on 23.06.2011 [Accessed 23 June 2011]

    POST publications (2003)“P.O.S.T.note January 2003 Number 193 FOOD POISONING” Parliamentary Copyright, 2003. 7, Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. available on-line at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/post/publications-by-year/pubs2003 [Accessed 23 June 2011]

    Rao S. (2011) “POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR)” Sridhar Rao P.N’s homepage at www.microrao.com available on-line at www.microrao.com/micronotes/pcr.pdf  

    Ryan KJ,  Ray CG (editors) (2004). PART V - Pathogenic Bacteria in “Sherris Medical Microbiology” (4th ed.). McGraw Hill. pp. 378–80.

    Skirrow MB. (1991) “Epidemiology of Campylobacter enteritis.” International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1991 Jan;12(1):9-16. 

    Smith D. F., Diack H. L., Pennington T. H.(2005) “Food Poisoning, Policy and Politics : Corned Beef and Typhoid in Britain in the 1960s.” Boydell Press, July 15, 2005 

    Sukhnanand S., Alcaine S., Warnick L. D., Su Wan-Lin, Hof J., Craver Mary Pat J., McDonough P., Boor K. J., and Wiedmann M.(2005) “DNA Sequence-Based Subtyping and Evolutionary Analysis of Selected Salmonella enterica Serotypes” Journal of Clinical Microbiology,  Aug 2005; 43: 3688 - 3698.

    Young K. T., Davis L. M., DiRita V. J.  (2007)  Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis.  Nat. Rev. Microbiol.  5:665–679.

    Vierstraete A.(1999) “Principle of the PCR” available on-line at http://users.ugent.be/~avierstr/principles/pcr.html

    Wellcome Trust (2011)“Campylobacter jejuni “  Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Research Limited available on-line at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/downloads/bacteria/campylobacter-jejuni.html   Last modified: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:08:17 GMT; [Accessed 28 June 2011]  

  • Информация о работе Detection of microbial contaminants of meat