Colonial politics of European countries

Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 05 Декабря 2011 в 13:49, контрольная работа

Описание работы

Colonial politics, like most politics, was based on differences of opinion about the concepts of economics and social relation that formed the background of the time. After the land was tamed and most of the native people expelled or killed, the average English settler considered himself an Englishman (male land owners only) with all of the prerogatives of his native land.

Содержание

Introduction………………………………..3



Main part…………………………………..4
The British Empire…………………
French colonial empire
German colonial empire



Conclusion…………………………………

List of references…………………………..12

Работа содержит 1 файл

Evropa.docx

— 57.32 Кб (Скачать)

   Colonial governments

   Bismarck’s successor in 1890, Leo von Caprivi, was willing to maintain the colonial burden of what already existed, but opposed new ventures. Others who followed, especially Bernhard von Bülow, as foreign minister and chancellor, sanctioned the acquisition of the Pacific Ocean colonies and provided substantial treasury assistance to existing protectorates to employ administrators, commercial agents, surveyors, local "peacekeepers" and tax collectors. Kaiser Wilhelm II understood and lamented his nation’s position as colonial followers rather than leaders. In an interview with Cecil Rhodes in March 1899 he stated the alleged dilemma clearly; "... Germany has begun her colonial enterprise very late, and was, therefore, at the disadvantage of finding all the desirable places already occupied."

   Nonetheless, Germany did assemble an overseas empire in Africa and the Pacific Ocean (see List of former German colonies) in the last two decades of the 19th century; "the creation of Germany’s colonial empire proceeded with the minimum of friction." The acquisition and the expansion of colonies were accomplished in a variety of ways, but principally through mercantile domination and pretexts that were always economic. Agreements and treaties with other colonial powers or interests followed, and fee simple purchases of land or island groups. Only Togoland and German Samoa became profitable and self-sufficient; the balance sheet for the colonies as a whole revealed a fiscal net loss for the empire.[21] Despite this, the leadership in Berlin committed the nation to the financial support, maintenance, development and defense of these possessions [3]. 

              
 

                         Prussia/German Empire (1640-1918) 

House of Hohenzollern, Electors of Brandenberg. (1640 – 1701)     

1640 – 1688 Frederick William The “Great Elector”, helped establish Prussian Absolutism during the Thirty Years War.
1688 –  1701 Frederick III Imitated Louis XIV, but sided with Britain during War of the Spanish Succession & became “King In Prussia”
 

House of Hohenzollern, Kings of Prussia (1701 – 1871) 

1701 – 1713 Frederick I Same dude as Elector Frederick III, but is King Frederick I once he gets the title in 1701
1713 – 1740 Frederick William I The “Soldier’s King.” Built up Prussian army, was tough on his oldest son. Very frugal.
1740 – 1786 Frederick II “Frederick the Great”.  One of the “Enlightened Despots”. Conqueror of Silesia, patron of Voltaire.
1786 – 1797 Frederick William II Nephew of F the G. Anti-Enlightenment. Presided over final partitions of Poland, but left Prussia bankrupt and weak
1797 – 1840 Frederick William III Lost at Austerlitz to Napoleon, but later prevailed vs. his son-in-law & gained land at the Congress of Vienna
1840 – 1861 Frederick William IV Reactionary and Romanticist. Opposed German unification, deferred to Austria. Anti-Hegel, pro fundamentalist Christian
1861- 1871 William I Brother of FW4. Appointed Otto Von Bismarck Prime Minister, let him run the country
 

House of Hohenzollern, German Emperors (1871 – 1918) 

1871 – 1888 William I Same guy as above. First German Emperor.
1888 Frederick III Ruled three months, died of cancer of the larynx
1888 – 1918 William II Born with lame arm. Fired OVB; WWI & Abdication
 
 

CONCLUSION

   At the end of the 16th century, England and the Netherlands began to challenge Portugal's monopoly of trade with Asia, forming private joint-stock companies to finance the voyages—the English, later British, East India Company and the Dutch East India Company, chartered in 1600 and 1602 respectively. The primary aim of these companies was to tap into the lucrative spice trade, an effort focused mainly on two regions; the East Indies archipelago, and an important hub in the trade network, India. There, they competed for trade supremacy with Portugal and with each other. Although England would ultimately eclipse the Netherlands as a colonial power, in the short term the Netherlands' more advanced financial system and the three Anglo-Dutch Wars of the 17th century left it with a stronger position in Asia. Hostilities ceased after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 when the Dutch William of Orange ascended the English throne, bringing peace between the Netherlands and England. A deal between the two nations left the spice trade of the East Indies archipelago to the Netherlands and the textiles industry of India to England, but textiles soon overtook spices in terms of profitability, and by 1720, in terms of sales, the British company had overtaken the Dutch.

   Bismarck’s successor in 1890, Leo von Caprivi, was willing to maintain the colonial burden of what already existed, but opposed new ventures. Others who followed, especially Bernhard von Bülow, as foreign minister and chancellor, sanctioned the acquisition of the Pacific Ocean colonies and provided substantial treasury assistance to existing protectorates to employ administrators, commercial agents, surveyors, local "peacekeepers" and tax collectors. Kaiser Wilhelm II understood and lamented his nation’s position as colonial followers rather than leaders. In an interview with Cecil Rhodes in March 1899 he stated the alleged dilemma clearly; "... Germany has begun her colonial enterprise very late, and was, therefore, at the disadvantage of finding all the desirable places already occupied."

   Nonetheless, Germany did assemble an overseas empire in Africa and the Pacific Ocean (see List of former German colonies) in the last two decades of the 19th century; "the creation of Germany’s colonial empire proceeded with the minimum of friction." The acquisition and the expansion of colonies were accomplished in a variety of ways, but principally through mercantile domination and pretexts that were always economic. Agreements and treaties with other colonial powers or interests followed, and fee simple purchases of land or island groups. Only Togoland and German Samoa became profitable and self-sufficient; the balance sheet for the colonies as a whole revealed a fiscal net loss for the empire.[21] Despite this, the leadership in Berlin committed the nation to the financial support, maintenance, development and defense of these possessions. 
 

List of references

1.  Abernethy, David (2000). The Dynamics of Global Dominance, European Overseas Empires 1415–1980. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-09314-4. Retrieved 22 July 2009.

2. Control and Order in French Colonial Louisbourg, 1713–1758, Andrew John Bayly Johnston, 2001, MSU

3. Gann, L.H. & Duignan, Peter. The Rulers of German East Africa, 1884-1914. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press. 1977, p. 271

Информация о работе Colonial politics of European countries